Start Dating the age of the earth

Dating the age of the earth

The actual underlying assumption is that, if those requirements have not been met, there is no reason for the data points to fall on a line.

Over time, the amounts of Pb-206 and Pb-207 will change in some samples, as these isotopes are decay end-products of uranium decay (U-238 decays to Pb-206, and U-235 decays to Pb-207).

This causes the data points to separate from each other.

Unfortunately, the age cannot be computed directly from material that is solely from the Earth.

There is evidence that energy from the Earth's accumulation caused the surface to be molten.

Those which appear the most frequently in are reproduced below: Note that these aren't necessarily the "best" or most difficult to refute of young-Earth arguments.

However, they are quite popular in modern creation-"science" literature (even though they should not be!

For example: Also note that the meteorite ages (both when dated mainly by Rb-Sr dating in groups, and by multiple means individually) are in exact agreement with the solar system "model lead age" produced earlier.

Young-Earthers have several methods which they claim to give "upper limits" to the age of the Earth, much lower than the age calculated above (usually in the thousands of years).

Some of these rocks are sedimentary, and include minerals which are themselves as old as 4.1 to 4.2 billion years.

Rocks of this age are relatively rare, however rocks that are at least 3.5 billion years in age have been found on North America, Greenland, Australia, Africa, and Asia.

(I believe this argument was originally put forth by Mormon young-Earther Melvin Cook, in a letter to the editor which was published in .) But helium can and does escape from the atmosphere, at rates calculated to be nearly identical to rates of production.